#Scratchpad memory vs cache full
#Scratchpad memory vs cache code

It is easy to see why a data allocation that never changes at runtime cannot achieve the full locality benefits of a cache. However, a drawback of such static allocation schemes is that they do not account for dynamic program behavior. A second category of algorithms partitions variables at compile-time into the two banks.

#Scratchpad memory vs cache code

Such methods incur large overheads in runtime, code size, energy consumption, and SRAM space for tags and deliver poor real-time guarantees just like hardware caches. Instructions are inserted before each load/store to check the software-maintained cache tags. First, software-caching schemes emulate the workings of a hardware cache in software. Primarily scratch pad allocation methods are of two types. It is motivated by its better real-time guarantees versus cache and by its significantly lower overheads in energy consumption, area, and overall runtime, even with a simple allocation scheme. A scratch pad is a fast compiler-managed SRAM memory that replaces the hardware-managed cache. With hardware support for pseudo-DMA and full DMA, which is already provided in some commercial systems, the runtime reductions increase to 33.4% and 34.2% respectively.Ībstract: In this research, we propose a highly predictable, low overhead, and, yet, dynamic, memory-allocation strategy for embedded systems with scratch pad memory. When compared to a provably optimal static allocation our results show runtime reductions ranging from 11% to 38%, averaging 31.2%, using no additional hardware support. In this method data that is about to be accessed frequently is copied into the SRAM using compiler-inserted code at fixed and infrequent points in the program. It is easy to see why a data allocation that never changes at runtime cannot achieve the full locality benefits of a cache.In this paper we present a dynamic allocation method for global and stack data that for the first time, (i) accounts for changing program requirements at runtime (ii) has no software-caching tags (iii) requires no run-time checks (iv) has extremely low overheads, and (v) yields 100% predictable memory access times.

For example, our previous work in derives a provably optimal static allocation for global and stack variables and achieves a speedup over all earlier methods. A second category of algorithms partitionsm variables at compile-time into the two banks. Such methods incur large overheads in runtime, code size, energy consumption and SRAM space for tags and deliver poor real-time guarantees just like hardware caches. Existing scratch-pad allocation methods are of two types.

It is motivated by its better real-time guarantees vs cache and by its significantly lower overheads in energy consumption, area and overall runtime, even with a simple allocation scheme. A scratch-pad is a fast compiler-managed SRAM memory that replaces the hardware-managed cache. Abstract: This paper presents a highly predictable, low overhead and yet dynamic, memory allocation strategy for embedded systems with scratch-pad memory.